<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google introduces FriendConnect, watch out Facebook!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.imod.co.za/2008/05/12/google-introduces-friendconnect-watch-out-facebook/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.imod.co.za/2008/05/12/google-introduces-friendconnect-watch-out-facebook/</link>
	<description>Cape Town blog by Chris M</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 07:23:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: HoTsTePPa</title>
		<link>http://www.imod.co.za/2008/05/12/google-introduces-friendconnect-watch-out-facebook/#comment-6970</link>
		<dc:creator>HoTsTePPa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 16:43:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://imod.co.za/index.php/?p=1958#comment-6970</guid>
		<description>Orkut doesn&#039;t play much in the western space. It is HUGE in India and was bought because of its sheer penetration. You must remember that when it comes to a numbers game, when u have a market like India, it gives you access to 1/6th of the population. in June of last year, India had a in internet penetration of 17.11%, thats about 205MILLION users!

The only reason why Google would want to get involved in the Social Networking space, is to further its viewership. Market share in all other services are decreasing and a way to add a new advertising revenue stream is what they need! They might not be losing money, but losing market share is worse!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Orkut doesn&#8217;t play much in the western space. It is HUGE in India and was bought because of its sheer penetration. You must remember that when it comes to a numbers game, when u have a market like India, it gives you access to 1/6th of the population. in June of last year, India had a in internet penetration of 17.11%, thats about 205MILLION users!</p>
<p>The only reason why Google would want to get involved in the Social Networking space, is to further its viewership. Market share in all other services are decreasing and a way to add a new advertising revenue stream is what they need! They might not be losing money, but losing market share is worse!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rustig</title>
		<link>http://www.imod.co.za/2008/05/12/google-introduces-friendconnect-watch-out-facebook/#comment-6959</link>
		<dc:creator>Rustig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 08:30:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://imod.co.za/index.php/?p=1958#comment-6959</guid>
		<description>Nothing against teenagers. Been there myself many moons ago. Maybe I will give old Google a chance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nothing against teenagers. Been there myself many moons ago. Maybe I will give old Google a chance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris M</title>
		<link>http://www.imod.co.za/2008/05/12/google-introduces-friendconnect-watch-out-facebook/#comment-6935</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 19:43:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://imod.co.za/index.php/?p=1958#comment-6935</guid>
		<description>That I can agree with, the continual movement from one platform to another is getting very annoying, but this one is a bit different in that fact.

LinkedIn is probably the best place to actually hang out, if you&#039;re wanting to stay away from silly teenagers :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That I can agree with, the continual movement from one platform to another is getting very annoying, but this one is a bit different in that fact.</p>
<p>LinkedIn is probably the best place to actually hang out, if you&#8217;re wanting to stay away from silly teenagers :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rustig</title>
		<link>http://www.imod.co.za/2008/05/12/google-introduces-friendconnect-watch-out-facebook/#comment-6924</link>
		<dc:creator>Rustig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 17:49:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://imod.co.za/index.php/?p=1958#comment-6924</guid>
		<description>Chris: Maybe my problem is that I am a bit tired at the moment with all the social networks. I agree that they serve their purpose. Maybe I am just to picky. Facebook for me is a place teenagers hangout and talk about everything and nothing. I do enjoy a bit of humour, but also for a network where I can have a decent conversation and learn something. Maybe they are out there. Places like Facebook is like a big stew and everyone has to eat from the same pot.
Really do not know. I hope something good will eventualy materialise from all of this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris: Maybe my problem is that I am a bit tired at the moment with all the social networks. I agree that they serve their purpose. Maybe I am just to picky. Facebook for me is a place teenagers hangout and talk about everything and nothing. I do enjoy a bit of humour, but also for a network where I can have a decent conversation and learn something. Maybe they are out there. Places like Facebook is like a big stew and everyone has to eat from the same pot.<br />
Really do not know. I hope something good will eventualy materialise from all of this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris M</title>
		<link>http://www.imod.co.za/2008/05/12/google-introduces-friendconnect-watch-out-facebook/#comment-6922</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 17:12:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://imod.co.za/index.php/?p=1958#comment-6922</guid>
		<description>Ah yes, Orkut.. must admit, I don&#039;t play around there much myself either. I see where you&#039;re going with this and I don&#039;t totally disagree. I just have a feeling that Google will have realized the importance of this and therefore will be putting a great deal of time and resources into it, but that&#039;s just my thought really :)

Hmmm, I sort of feel that I need to wait and see more before I get into a big discussion over this and shoot myself in the foot ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah yes, Orkut.. must admit, I don&#8217;t play around there much myself either. I see where you&#8217;re going with this and I don&#8217;t totally disagree. I just have a feeling that Google will have realized the importance of this and therefore will be putting a great deal of time and resources into it, but that&#8217;s just my thought really :)</p>
<p>Hmmm, I sort of feel that I need to wait and see more before I get into a big discussion over this and shoot myself in the foot ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Catto</title>
		<link>http://www.imod.co.za/2008/05/12/google-introduces-friendconnect-watch-out-facebook/#comment-6911</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Catto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 14:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://imod.co.za/index.php/?p=1958#comment-6911</guid>
		<description>Ya know, Chris, I use a lot of Google products myself. I love gmail. I think Google docs is amazingly useful. I participate in Usenet discussions via Google&#039;s groups. I almost exclusively use Google search. I use Google Reader to get my RSS feeds (stopped using FireFox for RSS).

The one thing I don&#039;t ever use is Google&#039;s Orkut. I signed up on it. I have a profile on Orkut, but no-one knows about it.

Google went and bought Orkut and did nothing with it. So that could be an indicator that they&#039;re weak on social networking.

The other thing of Google&#039;s that I don&#039;t use is Google Photos. I think Flickr is better.

My social networking tool is FaceBook. I have a myspace login, but no profile. I don&#039;t ever intend using myspace for anything.

Maybe when Google actually allows me to use their Friend Connect, I will become excited about it. I&#039;m actually extremely miffed that they would announce this new tool and then not make it available to me.

If I can&#039;t get easy access to it, then probably most of my visitors will not be able to either. That makes it a lame duck product already.

Have you watched their video? Major turn off. They need to REDO it, ASAP!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ya know, Chris, I use a lot of Google products myself. I love gmail. I think Google docs is amazingly useful. I participate in Usenet discussions via Google&#8217;s groups. I almost exclusively use Google search. I use Google Reader to get my RSS feeds (stopped using FireFox for RSS).</p>
<p>The one thing I don&#8217;t ever use is Google&#8217;s Orkut. I signed up on it. I have a profile on Orkut, but no-one knows about it.</p>
<p>Google went and bought Orkut and did nothing with it. So that could be an indicator that they&#8217;re weak on social networking.</p>
<p>The other thing of Google&#8217;s that I don&#8217;t use is Google Photos. I think Flickr is better.</p>
<p>My social networking tool is FaceBook. I have a myspace login, but no profile. I don&#8217;t ever intend using myspace for anything.</p>
<p>Maybe when Google actually allows me to use their Friend Connect, I will become excited about it. I&#8217;m actually extremely miffed that they would announce this new tool and then not make it available to me.</p>
<p>If I can&#8217;t get easy access to it, then probably most of my visitors will not be able to either. That makes it a lame duck product already.</p>
<p>Have you watched their video? Major turn off. They need to REDO it, ASAP!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris M</title>
		<link>http://www.imod.co.za/2008/05/12/google-introduces-friendconnect-watch-out-facebook/#comment-6908</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 13:37:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://imod.co.za/index.php/?p=1958#comment-6908</guid>
		<description>@Richard - Nice review and I agree with a good number of your points. The thing for me is that Google has a great deal of information and is in a position to launch something which is incredibly useful. I use Google Search, Docs, Spreadsheets, Calendar, Adsense, Adwords and a myriad of other services they provide and I am very happy with all of them and this is why something like this excites me. I guess we&#039;re going to have to wait and see, as they say, &#039;the proof is in the pudding&#039;..

@Rustig - Social Networking is massive and if we didn&#039;t have it, we&#039;d wish for it, that being said.. I agree, there&#039;s a huge saturation of platforms at the moment, but sooner or later there will be a massive merge or the likes and it&#039;s when this happens that I feel an equilibrium will be reached, what you think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Richard &#8211; Nice review and I agree with a good number of your points. The thing for me is that Google has a great deal of information and is in a position to launch something which is incredibly useful. I use Google Search, Docs, Spreadsheets, Calendar, Adsense, Adwords and a myriad of other services they provide and I am very happy with all of them and this is why something like this excites me. I guess we&#8217;re going to have to wait and see, as they say, &#8216;the proof is in the pudding&#8217;..</p>
<p>@Rustig &#8211; Social Networking is massive and if we didn&#8217;t have it, we&#8217;d wish for it, that being said.. I agree, there&#8217;s a huge saturation of platforms at the moment, but sooner or later there will be a massive merge or the likes and it&#8217;s when this happens that I feel an equilibrium will be reached, what you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rustig</title>
		<link>http://www.imod.co.za/2008/05/12/google-introduces-friendconnect-watch-out-facebook/#comment-6905</link>
		<dc:creator>Rustig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 09:52:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://imod.co.za/index.php/?p=1958#comment-6905</guid>
		<description>Not another &quot;social network&quot;. Heaven help us. No wonder I have to start using Roboform. Who on earth can remember al the bloody logins. It is time for me to become anti-social. Maybe it is away of collecting information for more unwanted advertising.
I really start to dislike this whole networking scene.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not another &#8220;social network&#8221;. Heaven help us. No wonder I have to start using Roboform. Who on earth can remember al the bloody logins. It is time for me to become anti-social. Maybe it is away of collecting information for more unwanted advertising.<br />
I really start to dislike this whole networking scene.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Catto</title>
		<link>http://www.imod.co.za/2008/05/12/google-introduces-friendconnect-watch-out-facebook/#comment-6903</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Catto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 08:31:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://imod.co.za/index.php/?p=1958#comment-6903</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know, Chris. I finally got to watch the google video now that their friend connect web page is up again, and a whole bunch of problems surfaced for me.

And just btw, it was an awful video. So awful, I found myself laughing at it. The presenter delivered a terribly boring monotonal presentation. It was like everything was a huge yawn for him.

I found it totally absurd that Google used as example a site constructed with DreamWeaver. That is so last century. Their example site had ZERO interactivity, being made in DreamWeaver. Visitors could read the site and that&#039;s about all.

But what about bloggers? We have an awesome array of interactivity built in already.

So with google&#039;s friend connect, I&#039;m going to wonder whether I should leave a comment on the blog post or use the google thing to write a comment that my social network can see.

And then there&#039;s site membership. WordPress already allows people to join, as do many other blog platforms. So now I have to join TWICE?

And what about space for all this extra google stuff? On the example site the google stuff took up a huge chunk on the right, but on blogs, we hardly have any space for all that crap.

Will this stuff get relegated to the footer where it will mostly go unnoticed and unused?

Lastly, I signed up and got told to wait for an invitation, so I can&#039;t check out any of this first hand for myself, right now.

By the time, google gets around to extending me an invite, maybe an asteroid would have hit and wiped out North America and none of this will matter anymore?

I can only hope, I guess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know, Chris. I finally got to watch the google video now that their friend connect web page is up again, and a whole bunch of problems surfaced for me.</p>
<p>And just btw, it was an awful video. So awful, I found myself laughing at it. The presenter delivered a terribly boring monotonal presentation. It was like everything was a huge yawn for him.</p>
<p>I found it totally absurd that Google used as example a site constructed with DreamWeaver. That is so last century. Their example site had ZERO interactivity, being made in DreamWeaver. Visitors could read the site and that&#8217;s about all.</p>
<p>But what about bloggers? We have an awesome array of interactivity built in already.</p>
<p>So with google&#8217;s friend connect, I&#8217;m going to wonder whether I should leave a comment on the blog post or use the google thing to write a comment that my social network can see.</p>
<p>And then there&#8217;s site membership. WordPress already allows people to join, as do many other blog platforms. So now I have to join TWICE?</p>
<p>And what about space for all this extra google stuff? On the example site the google stuff took up a huge chunk on the right, but on blogs, we hardly have any space for all that crap.</p>
<p>Will this stuff get relegated to the footer where it will mostly go unnoticed and unused?</p>
<p>Lastly, I signed up and got told to wait for an invitation, so I can&#8217;t check out any of this first hand for myself, right now.</p>
<p>By the time, google gets around to extending me an invite, maybe an asteroid would have hit and wiped out North America and none of this will matter anymore?</p>
<p>I can only hope, I guess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris M</title>
		<link>http://www.imod.co.za/2008/05/12/google-introduces-friendconnect-watch-out-facebook/#comment-6889</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 20:14:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://imod.co.za/index.php/?p=1958#comment-6889</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s exactly it, they&#039;ll connect everyone and anyone into one gigantic social network!

I agree, this is going to be absolutely massive, go go google!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s exactly it, they&#8217;ll connect everyone and anyone into one gigantic social network!</p>
<p>I agree, this is going to be absolutely massive, go go google!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

