When I read a headline along these lines I almost fell off my chair, $500,000 for one of the greatest and earliest content aggregation type websites – you’re kidding me? Apparently not, Digg was sold to Betaworks for just $500,000 plus equity.
A website that receives in excess of 16 million unique visitors a month and has a strong following, you’d never imagine it selling for so little. Betaworks said, “We are turning Digg back into a startup. Low budget, small team, fast cycles. How? We have spent the last 18 months building News.me as a mobile-first social news experience. The News.me team will take Digg back to its essence: the best place to find, read and share the stories the internet is talking about. Right now.”
In 2008 the company was valued at $175m, that gives you some perspective. Of course, there’s always more to the story, we’re unsure of more details around the equity stake that Digg has received from Betaworks, but nevertheless, I was amazed.
What do you think they’ll do?
UPDATE:
Some more details have come to light:
Sun Valley and self-driving cars aside, the story of the day today is that social news site Digg has sold its remaining assets for $500K to the NYC-based tech firm Betaworks. While that number is indeed in the ballpark, we’re hearing from multiple sources that the total price of the Digg acquisition was around $16 million, including the price paid for IP by a previously unreported acquirer, LinkedIn.
According to a familiar source, the Washington Post ended up paying $12 million for the Digg team. Around the same time, career social network LinkedIn paid between $3.75 million and $4 million for around 15 different Digg patents including the patent on “click a button to vote up a story”.
Betaworks picked up all the remaining assets today, including the domain, code, data and all the traffic for between $500k and $725k. We’re hearing that Borthwick and co. will license from LinkedIn whatever patents it needs to execute on what it chooses to do with those assets. I have no word on how the “single-digit millions equity deal” some are reporting fits in here exactly. via








Can you explain why you posted this news item to your blog?
This news has been featured on hundreds of news sites when it was still fresh news, I’m certain you didn’t do your own investigation that sheds new light into what’s been covered long before you.
Why are you not just linking or tweeting the news?
Why copy and paste news from elsewhere?
Does this only serve to full in between the paid blog posts?
I’m seriously want to know what use blogging about 3rd hand news is. I’m certain that your readers had seen this story ages ago, they’re also not uninformed, they visit real news sites.
I really like your web development and SEO articles with original content, I however this reposting old news is wasting everyone’s time.
Personally I feel you should keep to posting original content. News is covered pretty well by others.
Oh, your post title is
Digg sells for 0,000
So you can’t even re-report news correctly. Sorry for being a bitch but really. Sick to original content.
@Kevin – Absolutely, original content is always best and I love writing articles on web, SEO, marketing and the likes, but I also cater for an audience who is interested in this sort of thing (and doesn’t follow all the top aggregation websites), hence me publishing it – I can’t guarantee that everyone will like every article as I don’t operate inside a specific niche, all I can ask is that if you dislike an article, simply step over it and hopefully the next one will be better :)
Thank you for your comment, Kevin.
I didn’t know about this. Now I do, thanks Chris. Kevin, how much negative energy in your post. You snidely criticise Chris and ironically make a typo in your comment. Relax dude. Just skip over the ones you already know. You’ll have a much happier life.
Cheers Ross – I totally understand what Kevin is saying about the republishing, but unfortunately, as I said, I don’t cater to one group of people – a lot of iMod readers aren’t plugged into all the news channels like Mashable, TechCrunch and the likes, instead they rely on me to provide some of the breaking news. So, I understand, but I disagree and I’m happy to agree on disagreeing.
More importantly, can you believe that they sold? Can you believe that they sold for so little? It blew my mind!